The Disintermediation of Content
By: Sam Vaknin
Are content brokers - publishers, distributors, and record
companies - a thing of the past?
In one word: disintermediation
The gradual removal of layers of content brokering and
intermediation - mainly in manufacturing marketing - is the
continuation of a long term trend. Consider music for
instance. Streaming audio on the internet ("soft radio"), or
downloadable MP3 files may render the CD obsolete - but they
were preceded by radio music broadcasts. But the novelty is
that the Internet provides a venue for the marketing of niche
products and reduces the barriers to entry previously imposed
by the need to invest in costly "branding" campaigns and
manufacturing and distribution activities.
This trend is also likely to restore the balance between
artists and the commercial exploiters of their products. The
very definition of "artist" will expand to encompass all
creative people. One will seek to distinguish oneself, to
"brand" oneself and to auction one's services, ideas,
products, designs, experience, physique, or biography, etc.
directly to end-users and consumers. This is a return to pre-
industrial times when artisans ruled the economic scene. Work
stability will suffer and work mobility will increase in a
landscape of shifting allegiances, head hunting, remote
collaboration, and similar labour market trends.
But distributors, publishers, and record companies are not
going to vanish. They are going to metamorphose. This is
because they fulfil a few functions and provide a few services
whose importance is only enhanced by the "free for all"
Internet culture.
Content intermediaries grade content and separate the
qualitative from the ephemeral and the atrocious. The deluge
of self-published and vanity published e-books, music tracks
and art works has generated few masterpieces and a lot of
trash. The absence of judicious filtering has unjustly given a
bad name to whole segments of the industry (e.g., small, or
web-based publishers). Consumers - inundated, disappointed and
exhausted - will pay a premium for content rating services.
Though driven by crass commercial considerations, most
publishers and record companies do apply certain quality
standards routinely and thus are positioned to provide these
rating services reliably.
Content brokers are relationship managers. Consider
distributors: they provide instant access to centralized,
continuously updated, "addressbooks" of clients (stores,
consumers, media, etc.). This reduces the time to market and
increases efficiency. It alters revenue models very
substantially. Content creators can thus concentrate on what
they do best: content creation, and reduce their overhead by
outsourcing the functions of distribution and relationships
management. The existence of central "relationship ledgers"
yields synergies which can be applied to all the clients of
the distributor. The distributor provides a single address
that content re-sellers converge on and feed off.
Distributors, publishers and record companies also provide
logistical support: warehousing, consolidated sales reporting
and transaction auditing, and a single, periodic payment.
Yet, having said all that, content intermediaries still over-
charge their clients (the content creators) for their
services. This is especially true in an age of just-in-time
inventory and digital distribution. Network effects mean that
content brokers have to invest much less in marketing,
branding and advertising once a product's first mover
advantage is established. Economic laws of increasing, rather
than diminishing, returns mean that every additional unit sold
yields a HIGHER profit - rather than a declining one. The pie
is getting bigger.
Hence, the meteoric increase in royalties publishers pay
authors from sales of the electronic versions of their work
(anywhere from Random House's 35% to 50% paid by smaller
publishers). As this tectonic shift reverberates through the
whole distribution chain, retail outlets are beginning to
transact directly with content creators. The borders between
the types of intermediaries are blurred. Barnes and Noble (the
American bookstores chain) has, in effect, become a publisher.
Many publishers have virtual storefronts. Many authors sell
directly to their readers, acting as publishers. The
introduction of "book ATMs" - POD (Print On Demand) machines,
which will print
every conceivable title in minutes, on the spot, in "book
kiosks" - will give rise to a host of new intermediaries.
Intermediation is not gone. It is here to stay because it is
sorely needed. But it is in a state of flux. Old maxims break
down. New modes of operation emerge.
Functions are amalgamated, outsourced, dispensed with, or
created from scratch. It is an exciting scene, full with
opportunities.
|