The E-Books Evangelist
Interview with Glenn Sanders
By: Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.
Also published by United Press International (UPI)
Q. Why electronic publishing?
A. I was first introduced to electronic publishing on the
Internet in the late 1980s and became intrigued by the power
of this revolutionary development. Then, when Mosaic released
the first Web browser in 1992, the Internet finally had a
visual aspect. Suddenly, the vast Internet was transformed
from a dimly lit warehouse for data storage and exchange, to a
visible library and gallery for information. I was hooked.
In 1994, while teaching at a university in Japan, I created
what was probably one of the first (if not the first)
paperless reading classes. I taught myself HTML and built 26
Web-based reading lessons for the "comparative cultures"
course I taught there. The reading material in each lesson
linked to related websites and information. Instructions were
included for the exercises, which usually included finding
information or doing research somewhere on the Web. Students
emailed their results to me, and I emailed feedback and grades
to them. Students were not required to come to class, but were
required to turn in their "class work" results to me by Friday
evening.
Since then, I have created numerous Web sites, published a
number of electronic & print books, and hundreds of
articles. In the late 1990's I saw the confluence of three
factors that foretold the electronic publishing and e-book
revolution. The first was the imminent ubiquity of the
Internet. Next, was the growing need for mobile access to
information, and the availability of so much data in the
digital domain.
Finally, I could see the day when technology would catch up
with my vision of a portable information tablet. As of summer
2002, I am still waiting, but technological developments are
rapidly nearing the time, probably somewhere around 2005, when
affordable, portable, readable, wireless reading devices will
reach the mass markets. The company where I work, Rolltronics
Corporation, is developing thin, flexible electronics
technology that will enable many of these devices in the
future.
While living in Japan and working at Fujitsu, Inc., I founded
eBookNet and began toying with the design of a next-generation
information display device. In 1998, I founded eBookNet.com,
which became a renowned Web site that provided news and
community services for the e-book and e-publishing industry
for several years.
In 1999, NuvoMedia (the company that pioneered the current
generation of electronic reading devices with its "Rocket
eBook" in 1998) acquired eBookNet and hired me. NuvoMedia
supported eBookNet until April 2001.
A few months later, with the support of the Rolltronics
Foundation, Wade Roush (former managing editor of eBookNet)
and I founded the Electronic Publishing Resource Center
(EPRC), an industry-sponsored, non-profit organization, and
launched eBookWeb.org on the 4th of July 2001.
I see myself as an e-book evangelist, seeking to inform and
educate the world about electronic publishing. My vision is of
a world where information, entertainment, and books are
readily available to professionals, researchers, students, and
readers everywhere. So, even though I work full time for
Rolltronics doing business development, I continue my daily
efforts to help build the e-Book industry through
eBookWeb.org. The Website now leads in providing news,
information, resources, and community services to the e-media
industries.
Q. This has been a bad year for e-publishing. Leading brands
vanished, industry leaders retreated, technology gurus
bemoaned yet another missed prognosis - that e-books will
dethrone print books. What went wrong?
A. Ever since I first realized the need for portable
information devices, my belief in the future of e-books has
never been shaken. Despite the fact that e-book reality
replaced hype in 2000, and 2001 brought a temporary cyclical
economic downturn, I firmly believe and know that e-books and
e-publishing, or more generally portable information devices,
will play a primary role in the way that people write, create,
design, read, learn, access news and information, communicate,
interact, travel, enjoy art and entertainment, and experience
their world.
It is just taking longer to get there than many had hoped
around the turn of the century. There are still several
factors that need to come together to make e-books a
reality. The hardware is still not there. We need affordable,
light, thin, readable displays with battery life measured in
days or weeks, not hours. To be truly useful and portable, the
devices need to be wireless and perhaps with a backup cellular
connection for remote locales. Next, there needs to be much
more content available for distribution to these devices.
Secure but accessible infrastructure and standards need to be
in place for mass-market appeal. Then, adoption by libraries
and educational institutions will spread the use of e-books at
the grassroots level.
Q. Questions of device compatibility and standards have
plagued the industry from its inception. Will we end up with
an oligopoly of 2-3 formats and 2-3 corresponding readers, or
do you have a different take on the industry's future?
A. We may be destined to have several formats and platforms,
each of which is used for certain applications and types of
content. The reason is that there are basically four major
players, each with their own plan to dominate the e-Publishing
market.
Despite the fact that, in my opinion, Adobe's PDF is lacking
as an e-Book format, there are hundreds of millions of
documents in PDF in publishing companies, governments,
corporations, and schools. These will not be replaced
instantly, even if a unified format were agreed upon.
Then there is Microsoft, the 800-pound gorilla, who is slowly
and silently insinuating their reading platform into their
software and Windows operating system. The interoperability of
MS Reader software with MS Office products will make it
possible for many millions of documents to be converted to MS
Reader format.
Of course, there will need to be a portable device to display
all those e-documents. Despite the fact that many Pocket PCs
have been sold, they don't seem to be a major factor in e-
content sales. Now the timing of Microsoft's big push for the
MS tablet PC begins to make more sense.
The Gemstar format has an established base of customers and
actual dedicated devices, the Rocket eBook and REB1100 and
REB1200s. Gemstar's format actually has a lot of popular
content going for it, and their displays are much better than
the average computer display. Therefore they are more suitable
for portable reading.
And not surprisingly, the largest sales of electronic content
are going to the Palm Pilot compatible devices. The
established base of many millions of "Palm OS" customers has
been buying hundreds of thousands of e-books each year, and
the e-content sales are growing steadily.
How to unify these four goliaths? The Open eBook Forum's
standard is good for the formatting of the original document.
Microsoft and Gemstar adhere to the OeBF standard. But each
company has its own way of converting and displaying the OeBF
format in its device or software. So what is the answer? The
only way to rectify all of these heavyweight solutions is to
create a unified standard for displaying electronic content
that is the same across all platforms. Is this possible? That
is a question better answered by the experts at the OeBF...
Q. Some analysts blame the recent bloodbath on a dearth of
good content and wrong pricing. They derisively equate e-
publishing with vanity publishing. Do you find these
criticisms correct?
A. The amount of content is growing slowly but steadily.
There are two major problems that contribute to the relative
dearth of titles becoming available. One is that extra
negotiations and agreements are necessary to publish e-books,
or to price them differently from "p-books." Another is that
since the market still isn't there, many publishers do not
have the resources, or haven't budgeted enough money to
aggressively convert content. And many veteran publishers
still produce the final version of a book in a format that is
not easy to convert for electronic publication.
As far as vanity publishing goes, that is not defined by the
medium. Of course electronic publishing makes it easier to
distribute "vanity-published" works. And it is easier to
become self-published. And there are a few vanity publishers
out there, but they usually don't last long. Still, most
publishers and electronic publishers strive to produce top
quality titles. They know that this is the only long-term
viable business model. They screen and edit the titles that
they publish. They actively promote their authors' works. In
this sense, a publisher's name brand will become much more
important to customers than is presently the case.
Q. Traditional print publishers treat e-books (the content,
not the devices) as electronic facsimiles of the print
editions. Can e-books offer a different reading experience? In
what way are they different to print books?
A. E-books that are nothing more than electronic copies of the
print version offer only portability and access as
advantages. Of course e-books can be searched and annotated.
The vision impaired can read with large fonts. Students can
look up words in a built-in dictionary.
But, similar to popular movie DVDs that include many extras,
e-books should really take advantage of the flexibility and
capacity of the electronic medium. Publishers could include
the author's notes, rough sketches, background, audio or video
from the author or the scene of the books. Reference works
should be electronically updateable via the Internet. Book
club members might be able to send each other their
annotations and comments. Readers might send feedback to the
author and/or publisher. Fans might write and distribute
alternate endings, or add characters or scenes.
Q. E-publishing is at the nexus of sea changes in copyright
laws. Does e-publishing encourage piracy? Have publishers gone
overboard in an effort to preserve their intellectual property
rights? Do you foresee new models of revenues and royalties
and a novel definition of intellectual property?
A. E-publishing does not encourage piracy, but being in
electronic format, it certainly becomes susceptible to the
same kind of piracy that all other kinds of e-content
experience. A number of models, or rather experiments, are
being tried with respect to the level of control of
intellectual property and the associated financial model. So
far, there has not been a clear answer as to which experiment
yields the best results.
One factor is that the market is still in its infancy and
therefore is in a state of flux. The continuum runs from
strict and limited control offered by digital rights
management systems, to free e-content (hopefully) supported by
either stimulating sales of print books, or advertisements. In
the middle are publishers who provide limited security, or
those who use no security and depend on the basic honesty of
most people. As the market grows, we will discover which
models work best in which situations for which types of
content.
Q. E-books were supposed to bring about disintermediation and
foster a direct dialog between author and readership. Have
they succeeded? What is the future of content brokers, such as
publishers and record companies?
A. Yes, there is an enhanced dialog between author and
audience. On eBookWeb.org, we provide space for authors to
have a personal page. These are some of the most popular pages
on the site. On other Websites and through the publications
themselves, authors are coming in closer digital contact with
their readers through email or other forms of dialog. For low
volumes of messages, this is a good thing. But top-selling
writers could not handle email from thousands of dedicated
fans. Even in an electronic world, it is still true that as
one becomes more popular, one has to become less and less
accessible in order to conserve one's time.
Yes, it is also much easier to become self-published
electronically. However, there is usually a huge difference
between simply being published, and actually reaching a large
audience and reaping significant sales of your title. The Web
continues to grow exponentially, but our time and attention
span remain limited. These two opposing dynamics mean that we
are forced to narrow our attention to a relatively few
reliable content providers, representing an ever smaller
proportion of the total content available.
How can an author be heard above the noise? Get a publisher
who will promote your work. But before that, get an editor or
publisher who will help you polish your work until it shines
brightly enough to gain popularity once it secures the
attention of your audience. The dynamics and demands of the
free market, and the reasons for having publishing companies
do not disappear on the Internet. In fact, they may become
more important as the amount of content and choices continues
to grow.
One important change that I do foresee is that small,
independent niche publishers will make a resurgence due to the
electronic medium. This is definitely a good thing for
readers. Independent publishers who build a reputation for
unique, quality content, will develop a following of faithful
customers over time.
Q. Some marketing pundits believe in viral or buzz marketing.
They advocate giving away free content to generate "buzz".
They believe that sales will follow. Do you subscribe to this
view?
A. This relates to the question of copyright laws and which
model is best for a particular situation. It also has to do
with previous models on the Web. If the goal is to gain an
audience and fame, then giving it away to hopefully millions
of people is a good idea. The popular dynamic of the Internet
is to build a massive audience by giving away something of
value. Then, one slowly begins to charge for some content or
service, while still providing something for free, to continue
to attract a large following.
The results of the late 1990s indicate a mixed success,
probably due in part to the origins of the Internet, where
everything was free. The expectation was that if it was on the
Net, it was free. The beginnings of commercialism on the Net
in the early 1990's were met with vehement resistance from the
"old timers" who strongly opposed the commercialization of
their beloved network. Of course, a number of companies such
as eBay, Amazon, and Yahoo, attracted and kept a large
audience. But only a few are truly profitable today.
If the goal is to make maximum profit from each unit of
content that is downloaded, then one must charge money, or
sell advertisements. Unfortunately, the revenues from
advertising on the Net have fallen dramatically in the last
few years. So if you put a price tag on your content, how much
should you charge? Most independent electronic publishers
charge a few dollars for their titles, anywhere from $1 each
to about $5 or $7 per e-book. These relatively low prices
reflect the desire to attract a large pool of customers. They
also reflect the belief common among readers that since it is
electronic and not print content, the price should be
lower. They feel that without the cost of printing and
transporting books, the publisher should set a lower price...
Q. As you see it, is the Internet merely another content
distribution channel or is there more to it then this? The
hype of synergy and collapsing barriers to entry has largely
evaporated together with the fortunes of the likes of AOL Time
Warner. Is the Internet a revolution - or barely an evolution?
A. In the beginning, the Internet was a revolution. Email
brought the people of our Earth closer together. The Net
enabled telecommuting and now as much as 10% of the world
works at home via computer and Internet. The Internet makes it
possible for artists to publish their own books, music, videos
and Websites. Video conferencing has enabled conversations
without limitations of space. The Internet has made vast
amounts of information available to students and researchers
at the click of the mouse. The 24/7 access and ease of
ordering products has stimulated online commerce and sales at
retail stores.
But it is not a cure-all. And, now that the Net is part of our
everyday lives, it is subject to the same cycles of media
hype, as well as social, emotional, and business
factors. Things will never be the same, and the changes have
just begun. The present generation has never known a world
without computers. When they reach working age, they will be
much more inclined to use the Net for a majority of their
reading and entertainment needs. Then, e-books will truly take
hold and become ubiquitous. Between now and then, we have work
to do, building the foundation of this remarkable industry.
|